Prior Express Written Consent (PEWC) Explained: A TCPA Field Guide for Lead Buyers

Bill Rice

30+ years in mortgage & lead gen

June 20, 2026

What PEWC actually is

If you buy, sell, or call leads, "prior express written consent" (PEWC) is the phrase that keeps you out of trouble. It is the specific kind of consent the TCPA requires before you can send certain marketing calls and texts. It is not a checkbox you bury in a privacy policy, and it is not something you can assume because someone filled out a form. It is a defined legal standard, and the details matter.

The good news: once you understand the four pieces that make consent valid, it is straightforward to build a form that captures it and a system that keeps it. This guide walks through both.

When the TCPA requires PEWC

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act lives at 47 U.S.C. § 227. The part operators run into most is the restriction on autodialed and prerecorded calls to wireless numbers: under § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii), you generally cannot use an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice to call a cell phone without the prior express consent of the person you are calling. The FCC's rules, at 47 CFR § 64.1200, build on that and draw a sharper line for marketing.

Here is the practical rule of thumb:

  • Marketing or telemarketing calls and texts to a cell phone, made with an autodialer or a prerecorded/artificial voice, require prior express written consent.
  • Non-marketing informational calls (an appointment reminder, a delivery notice) sit under a lower "prior express consent" bar.

Text messages count as calls for TCPA purposes, so the same written-consent standard applies to autodialed SMS marketing.

Marketing is the trigger

The written-consent standard kicks in specifically for advertising and telemarketing. If the message promotes a product or service, treat it as marketing and get PEWC.

The four elements of valid PEWC

The FCC defines prior express written consent at 47 CFR § 64.1200(f)(9). Strip out the legal language and it is an agreement that has to do four things:

  • Be in writing and signed. It must be a written agreement bearing the signature of the person being called.
  • Clearly authorize the specific seller. The agreement must clearly authorize the seller to deliver advertisements or telemarketing messages using an autodialer or a prerecorded/artificial voice, and it must identify the phone number the person is authorizing you to contact.
  • Disclose what they are agreeing to — clearly and conspicuously. Under § 64.1200(f)(9)(i)(A), the agreement must disclose that, by signing, the person authorizes the seller to deliver telemarketing calls using an autodialer or prerecorded/artificial voice.
  • State that consent is not a condition of purchase. Under § 64.1200(f)(9)(i)(B), the disclosure must tell the person they are not required to sign, or to agree, as a condition of buying any property, goods, or services.

That last one trips up a lot of funnels. You cannot force consent in exchange for a quote, a download, or a service. It has to be genuinely optional.

"Clear and conspicuous," by the way, is also defined. Under § 64.1200(f)(3) it means a notice that would be apparent to the reasonable consumer, separate and distinguishable from the advertising copy or other disclosures. In plain terms: don't hide it in gray six-point type at the bottom of the page.

"Not a condition of purchase" is mandatory

Tying the consent to whether someone can complete a purchase or get a quote can invalidate the consent. Keep the autodial/text authorization optional and say so on the form.

The Operator’s Compliance Brief

What changed in lead-gen compliance, and what to do about it. Free, no spam.

Electronic signatures count

You do not need a wet-ink signature. The FCC's definition at § 64.1200(f)(9)(ii) says "signature" includes an electronic or digital form of signature, to the extent it is valid under applicable federal or state contract law. That ties into the federal E-SIGN Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7001, which says a signature or record cannot be denied legal effect just because it is electronic.

For most lead-gen operators, that means a checkbox plus a submit action on a web form can serve as a valid signature — provided the disclosure language meets the elements above and you capture proof of the agreement.

You may have heard about a 2023 FCC rule that would have required consent to be given to a single, specific seller and limited to logically related topics — the so-called "one-to-one" rule. In Insurance Marketing Coalition Ltd. v. FCC (11th Cir., Jan. 24, 2025), the Eleventh Circuit vacated that requirement, holding the FCC had exceeded its authority. So the one-to-one restriction is not in force. The core PEWC elements above, however, remain the law.

The landscape moves

TCPA interpretation shifts through FCC rulemaking and court decisions, and state "mini-TCPA" laws add their own requirements. Build to the federal baseline, then check your states.

How to capture and keep PEWC

The goal is to be able to prove, for any given lead, exactly what they agreed to and when. Practical steps:

  • Put the full disclosure right at the point of consent — clear, conspicuous, separate from your marketing copy, naming the seller(s) and stating consent is not required to buy.
  • Use an unchecked, affirmative action the consumer takes themselves. Don't pre-check the box.
  • Capture and store the proof: the exact disclosure language shown, a timestamp, IP address, the page URL, and the phone number authorized.
  • Version your consent language so you can show what a given lead saw on the day they signed.
  • Honor revocation and keep that record too. Consent can be withdrawn, and you need to act on it.
  • Keep records for years, not weeks. TCPA exposure runs at $500 per violation, up to $1,500 for willful or knowing violations under § 227(b)(3) — and the burden of proving consent generally falls on you.

If you buy leads, demand this proof from your sources and store it. A lead is only as clean as the consent record behind it.

Make consent provable, not just present

"We had consent" is not a defense. "Here is the exact language this person saw, the box they checked, the timestamp, and the IP" is. Build your intake so the proof is automatic.

Not Legal Advice

This is general information for operators, not legal advice. The TCPA, FCC rules, and state laws change and apply differently to different situations. Confirm specifics with qualified counsel before relying on any consent practice.

Sources

  1. 47 CFR § 64.1200 — Delivery restrictionsLegal Information Institute, Cornell Law School (accessed 2026-06-30)
  2. 47 U.S.C. § 227 — Restrictions on use of telephone equipmentLegal Information Institute, Cornell Law School (accessed 2026-06-30)
  3. 15 U.S.C. § 7001 — General rule of validity (E-SIGN Act)Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School (accessed 2026-06-30)
  4. Insurance Marketing Coalition Ltd. v. FCC, No. 24-10277 (11th Cir. Jan. 24, 2025)U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (accessed 2026-06-30)
Bill Rice

30+ years in lead gen · BRSG Founder

Bill Rice has spent 30+ years in mortgage, lending, and performance marketing — generating leads, buying them, and building the systems that route and work them. He founded a performance-marketing agency, owned a direct-to-consumer lender, and wrote The Lead Buyer's Playbook. He built Lead Compliance Hub to help operators navigate the legal landmines of online lead generation from an operator's seat, not a law firm's. Nothing he writes here is legal advice.

Key Terms to Know

The Operator’s Compliance Brief

What changed in lead-gen compliance, and what to do about it. Free, no spam.